User contributions for A legion of trolls
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
24 January 2012
- 14:3314:33, 24 January 2012 diff hist +9 Talk:Existential risk No edit summary current
- 14:3214:32, 24 January 2012 diff hist +1,146 N Talk:Existential risk acknowledge the subjectivity of "existential" with other phrases, why not focus on a discipline of including many extreme scenarios?
- 14:2514:25, 24 January 2012 diff hist +1,522 Talk:End civilization as we know it it's silly to discuss *only* scenarios where *all* humans die out, and/or to try to control an existing phrase ("existential risk") that does *not* mean that in order to do so... isn't it? current
23 January 2012
- 20:2020:20, 23 January 2012 diff hist +726 N Talk:Issue/position/argument what notation is preferable for such structures on less wrong? current
- 20:1520:15, 23 January 2012 diff hist +425 Talk:Crocker's rules mining the arguments
- 20:0720:07, 23 January 2012 diff hist +2,604 N Talk:Crocker's rules evidence of Crocker's influence on Wikipedia, a forming debate from 2003 or so
- 19:3719:37, 23 January 2012 diff hist +311 Talk:End civilization as we know it It's just less wrong to acknowledge that the "end", the "civilization", the "we" and the "know" are all fairly subjective terms and will remain so,
- 19:3619:36, 23 January 2012 diff hist +724 N Talk:End civilization as we know it let's elaborate phrases that are generally accepted as meaning what is actually meant when the term is used, and over time try to differentiate those from objectively definable levels of risk, rather
- 19:3419:34, 23 January 2012 diff hist +30 N End civilization as we know it #REDIRECT existential risk though objecively what most people mean when they use this term is a threat to "end civilization as we know it", nothing more, as some humans would physically survive current
- 19:3219:32, 23 January 2012 diff hist −8 Existential risk "end civilization as we know it" is the most objective description of what people almost always actually mean when they say "existential risk"
- 19:3119:31, 23 January 2012 diff hist +664 Existential risk more examples
- 19:2719:27, 23 January 2012 diff hist +713 Existential risk existential risks are not all scoped "all of humanity", it's entirely possible (though problematic) to define an existential risk for say the Republican Party or a small island civilization
- 19:2019:20, 23 January 2012 diff hist +1,057 Positive bias imagine one hundred algorithms for stock market prediction placed in one hundred safety deposit boxes under a hundred different assumed names....
- 19:0219:02, 23 January 2012 diff hist +973 User:A legion of trolls some useful debates current
- 18:5018:50, 23 January 2012 diff hist +272 N Talk:Interview series on risks from AI Is there a more general compendium of issue/position/argument on this issue?
- 18:4818:48, 23 January 2012 diff hist +44 User:A legion of trolls open links are good...
- 18:4718:47, 23 January 2012 diff hist +128 User:A legion of trolls the right to disappear
- 18:4618:46, 23 January 2012 diff hist +299 User:A legion of trolls You have a right to know that no one is paying for these contributions, it's strictly volunteer and motivated by genuine interests and values of real persons or people who are not paid to skew this de
- 18:4418:44, 23 January 2012 diff hist +366 N User:A legion of trolls simple intro
- 18:4218:42, 23 January 2012 diff hist +856 Crocker's rules →Similar protocols (contrasted): A lack of freedom to make emotionally uncomfortable observations is often thought to lead to groupthink. ...
- 18:3718:37, 23 January 2012 diff hist −1 Crocker's rules →Related or derivative protocols: renamed == Similar protocols (contrasted) ==
- 18:3618:36, 23 January 2012 diff hist +245 Crocker's rules Related or derivative protocols
- 18:3518:35, 23 January 2012 diff hist +700 Crocker's rules another related principle
- 18:3018:30, 23 January 2012 diff hist +662 Crocker's rules Crocker emphasized, repeatedly, in Wikipedia discourse and elsewhere, that one could only adopt Crocker's rules to apply to oneself, and could not impose them on a debate or forum with participants wh
- 18:1018:10, 23 January 2012 diff hist +643 Help:User Guide significant copyedit to introductory paragraphs, wikis are not "unique" they are the standard way of producing readable content for third parties who didn't participate in editing it