Difference between revisions of "Adversarial process"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
An '''[[wikipedia:adversarial process|adversarial process]]''' is a form of [[truth-seeking]] or [[conflict resolution]] in which identifiable [[faction]]s hold one-sided positions.
 
An '''[[wikipedia:adversarial process|adversarial process]]''' is a form of [[truth-seeking]] or [[conflict resolution]] in which identifiable [[faction]]s hold one-sided positions.
  
Adversarial processes are especially common in [[politics]], where they're encouraged by the current use of democratic voting systems.
+
Adversarial processes seem to be at the core of the Western idea of "fairness", which encourages their use in potentially violent contexts as a basic means of conflict reduction.  They are especially common in [[politics]], where they're encouraged by the current use of democratic voting systems. Legal courts often employ adversarial processes to evaluate a defendant's alleged wrong-doing and decide appropriate restitution.  Legal [[ethical code]]s and [[standard of evidence|standards of evidence]] are needed in order to ensure that the overall process approximates truth-seeking.
 
 
Legal courts often employ adversarial processes to evaluate a defendant's alleged wrong-doing and decide appropriate restitution.  Legal [[ethical code]]s and [[standard of evidence|standards of evidence]] are needed in order to ensure that the overall process approximates truth-seeking.
 
  
 
The operation of a [[prediction market]] may also be seen as a kind of adversarial process, in which bid and ask prices are constantly compared.
 
The operation of a [[prediction market]] may also be seen as a kind of adversarial process, in which bid and ask prices are constantly compared.
  
 
Some view Wikipedia as an adversarial process where alternating edits to an article seek to balance what is seen by each author as an extreme [[point of view]].  Wikipedia's policy of a "neutral point of view" implicitly assumes that such adversarial edits will eventually converge to an equilibrium.
 
Some view Wikipedia as an adversarial process where alternating edits to an article seek to balance what is seen by each author as an extreme [[point of view]].  Wikipedia's policy of a "neutral point of view" implicitly assumes that such adversarial edits will eventually converge to an equilibrium.
 +
 +
== See also ==
 +
* [[Arguments as soldiers]]
 +
* [[Color politics]]
 +
* [[Mind-killer]]

Revision as of 00:52, 5 October 2009

An adversarial process is a form of truth-seeking or conflict resolution in which identifiable factions hold one-sided positions.

Adversarial processes seem to be at the core of the Western idea of "fairness", which encourages their use in potentially violent contexts as a basic means of conflict reduction. They are especially common in politics, where they're encouraged by the current use of democratic voting systems. Legal courts often employ adversarial processes to evaluate a defendant's alleged wrong-doing and decide appropriate restitution. Legal ethical codes and standards of evidence are needed in order to ensure that the overall process approximates truth-seeking.

The operation of a prediction market may also be seen as a kind of adversarial process, in which bid and ask prices are constantly compared.

Some view Wikipedia as an adversarial process where alternating edits to an article seek to balance what is seen by each author as an extreme point of view. Wikipedia's policy of a "neutral point of view" implicitly assumes that such adversarial edits will eventually converge to an equilibrium.

See also