Difference between revisions of "Applause light"
(transcluded summary from "Applause Lights") |
(→See also) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*[[Halo effect]] | *[[Halo effect]] | ||
| + | *[[Guessing the teacher's password]], [[Belief as attire]] | ||
*[[Ugh field]] | *[[Ugh field]] | ||
| − | |||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||
Revision as of 06:30, 20 October 2011
We believe we are already within a democratic system. Some factors are still missing, like the expression of the people's will. - Roberto Eduardo Viola
The substance of a democracy is the specific mechanism that resolves policy conflicts. If all groups had the same preferred policies, there would be no need for democracy - we would automatically cooperate. The resolution process can be a direct majority vote, or an elected legislature, or even a voter-sensitive behavior of an AI, but it has to be something. What does it mean to call for a "democratic" solution if you don't have a conflict-resolution mechanism in mind?
I think it means that you have said the word "democracy", so the audience is supposed to cheer. It's not so much a propositional statement, as the equivalent of the "Applause" light that tells a studio audience when to clap.
