Difference between revisions of "Aumann's agreement theorem"
From Lesswrongwiki
Z. M. Davis (talk | contribs) (→See also) |
Z. M. Davis (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Aumann's agreement theorem''', roughly speaking, says that two agents acting rationally (in a certain precise sense) and with [[common knowledge]] of each other's beliefs cannot agree to disagree. More specifically, if two people are genuine [[Bayesian]]s, share common [[priors]], and have common knowledge of each other's current probability assignments, then they must have equal probability assignments. | '''Aumann's agreement theorem''', roughly speaking, says that two agents acting rationally (in a certain precise sense) and with [[common knowledge]] of each other's beliefs cannot agree to disagree. More specifically, if two people are genuine [[Bayesian]]s, share common [[priors]], and have common knowledge of each other's current probability assignments, then they must have equal probability assignments. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 16:10, 9 September 2009
Aumann's agreement theorem, roughly speaking, says that two agents acting rationally (in a certain precise sense) and with common knowledge of each other's beliefs cannot agree to disagree. More specifically, if two people are genuine Bayesians, share common priors, and have common knowledge of each other's current probability assignments, then they must have equal probability assignments.
See also
Blog posts
- Agreeing to Agree by Hal Finney
- The Proper Use of Humility by Eliezer Yudkowsky
- The Coin Guessing Game by Hal Finney - A toy problem illustrating the mechanics of Aumann agreement.
References
- Robert J. Aumann (1976). "Agreeing to Disagree". The Annals of Statistics 4 (6): 1236-1239. ISSN 00905364. (PDF)
- Tyler Cowen and Robin Hanson (2004). Are Disagreements Honest?. (PDF, Talk video)
