Difference between revisions of "Color politics"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Blog posts)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
==Blog posts==
 
==Blog posts==
*[http://www.overcomingbias.com/2006/12/a_fable_of_scie.html A Fable of Science and Politics] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
+
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/lt/the_robbers_cave_experiment/ The Robbers Cave Experiment] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
*[http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/03/blue_or_green_o.html Blue or Green on Regulation?] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]] — [[Burch's law]] isn't a [[scales of justice fallacy|soldier-argument]] for regulation; estimating the appropriate level of regulation in each particular case is a superior [[third option]].
+
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/gt/a_fable_of_science_and_politics/ A Fable of Science and Politics] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
 +
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/h2/blue_or_green_on_regulation/ Blue or Green on Regulation?] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]] - [[Burch's law]] isn't a [[scales of justice fallacy|soldier-argument]] for regulation; estimating the appropriate level of regulation in each particular case is a superior [[third option]].
  
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}
 
[[Category:Jargon]]
 
[[Category:Jargon]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]

Revision as of 23:01, 28 May 2009

In articles at Overcoming Bias and Less Wrong, the words "Blues" and "Greens" are often used to refer to two opposing political factions.

The terms come from the names of chariot racing teams, that differed in nothing but the team colors, but rivalry of whose fans sometimes reached the level of gang wars.[1]

Political factions usually identify with political positions, and use arguments as soldiers to defend their side. However, such dichotomies are often false dilemmas, which can be shown by presenting third options.

See also

Footnotes

Blog posts