Criticisms of the rationalist movement

From Lesswrongwiki
Revision as of 10:03, 18 March 2018 by Deku-shrub (talk | contribs) (See also)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Criticisms of the rationalist movement and Less Wrong have existed for most of its duration on various grounds.

Cult of Rationality

Less Wrong has been referred to as a cult phyg on numerous occasions,[1][2][3] with Eliezer Yudkowsky as its leader. Eliezer's confidence in his AI safety work outside of mainstream academia and self-professed intelligence renders him highly unpopular with his critics.[4]

Neoreaction

The Neoreaction movement,[5] is a notoriously adjacent idea to the community. Whist it has being explicitly refuted by figures such as Eliezer[6][7] and Scott,[8] it is often actively-associated by critics.[9][10]

Rationalism

The movement has been criticized as overemphasizing inductive reasoning over empiricism,[11] a criticism that has been refuted by Scott Alexander.[12]

Roko's basilisk

The Roko's basilisk thought experiment was notorious in that it required specific preconditions available nearly exclusively within the Less Wrong community that rendered the the reader vulnerable to this 'memetic hazard'. As such it has drawn derision from critics who feel perception risk from unfriendly AI is overstated within the community.[13][14]

Transhumanism

Less Wrong's community was partially founded by soliciting users from the transhumanist SL4 mailing list and Eliezer Yudkowsky is himself a prominent transhumanist.

As such, the fringe nature of transhumanist ideas such as cryonics, AGI takeover[15] has met with continued scorn from the skeptics based at RationalWiki.[16]

See also

References