Difference between revisions of "Crocker's rules"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(link to post, elaborate)
m (tidied up a bit, changed "bayesian evidence" to "rational evidence".)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Crocker's Rules''', named after [[wikipedia:Lee Daniel Crocker]], are a rationality-enhancing technique.
+
'''Crocker's rules''', named after [[wikipedia:Lee Daniel Crocker|Lee Daniel Crocker]], is a rationality-enhancing technique.
  
By declaring commitment to Crocker's Rules, one authorizes other debaters to [[optimization|optimize]] their messages for information, even when this entails that emotional feelings will be disregarded. The underlying assumption is that rudeness is sometimes necessary for effective conveyance of information, if only to [[signaling|signal]] a lack of patience or tolerance: after all, knowing whether the speaker is becoming angry or despondent is useful [[Bayesian evidence]].
+
By declaring commitment to Crocker's rules, one authorizes other debaters to [[optimization|optimize]] their messages for information, even when this entails that emotional feelings will be disregarded. The underlying assumption is that rudeness is sometimes necessary for effective conveyance of information, if only to [[signaling|signal]] a lack of patience or tolerance: after all, knowing whether the speaker is becoming angry or despondent is useful [[rational evidence]].
  
Thus, one who has committed to these rules largely gives up the right to complain about emotional provocation, flaming, abuse and other violations of [[etiquette]] in the interest of effective debate.
+
Thus, one who has committed to these rules largely gives up the right to complain about emotional provocation, flaming, abuse and other violations of etiquette in the interest of effective debate.
  
In contrast to [[radical honesty]], Crocker's Rules encourage being tactful with anyone who hasn't specifically accepted them. This follows the general principle of being "liberal in what you accept and conservative in what you send".
+
In contrast to [[radical honesty]], Crocker's rules encourage being tactful with anyone who hasn't specifically accepted them. This follows the general principle of being "liberal in what you accept and conservative in what you send".
  
== See also ==
+
==Blog posts==
* [http://lesswrong.com/lw/j9/radical_honesty/ Radical honesty], by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]  
+
 
 +
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/j9/radical_honesty/ Radical honesty] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
 +
 
 +
==Related concepts==
 +
 
 +
*[[Rational evidence]]
 +
*[[Signaling]]
  
 
[[Category:Techniques]]
 
[[Category:Techniques]]

Revision as of 05:52, 18 July 2009

Crocker's rules, named after Lee Daniel Crocker, is a rationality-enhancing technique.

By declaring commitment to Crocker's rules, one authorizes other debaters to optimize their messages for information, even when this entails that emotional feelings will be disregarded. The underlying assumption is that rudeness is sometimes necessary for effective conveyance of information, if only to signal a lack of patience or tolerance: after all, knowing whether the speaker is becoming angry or despondent is useful rational evidence.

Thus, one who has committed to these rules largely gives up the right to complain about emotional provocation, flaming, abuse and other violations of etiquette in the interest of effective debate.

In contrast to radical honesty, Crocker's rules encourage being tactful with anyone who hasn't specifically accepted them. This follows the general principle of being "liberal in what you accept and conservative in what you send".

Blog posts

Related concepts