Difference between revisions of "Crocker's rules"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (bylines)
m (Removed unsubstantiated claim.)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Crocker's rules''', named after [[wikipedia:Lee Daniel Crocker|Lee Daniel Crocker]], is a rationality-enhancing technique.
+
'''Crocker's rules''', named after [[wikipedia:Lee Daniel Crocker|Lee Daniel Crocker]], is a social communication protocol.
  
 
By declaring commitment to Crocker's rules, one authorizes other debaters to [[optimization|optimize]] their messages for information, even when this entails that emotional feelings will be disregarded. The underlying assumption is that rudeness is sometimes necessary for effective conveyance of information, if only to [[signaling|signal]] a lack of patience or tolerance: after all, knowing whether the speaker is becoming angry or despondent is useful [[rational evidence]].
 
By declaring commitment to Crocker's rules, one authorizes other debaters to [[optimization|optimize]] their messages for information, even when this entails that emotional feelings will be disregarded. The underlying assumption is that rudeness is sometimes necessary for effective conveyance of information, if only to [[signaling|signal]] a lack of patience or tolerance: after all, knowing whether the speaker is becoming angry or despondent is useful [[rational evidence]].

Revision as of 10:00, 23 January 2012

Crocker's rules, named after Lee Daniel Crocker, is a social communication protocol.

By declaring commitment to Crocker's rules, one authorizes other debaters to optimize their messages for information, even when this entails that emotional feelings will be disregarded. The underlying assumption is that rudeness is sometimes necessary for effective conveyance of information, if only to signal a lack of patience or tolerance: after all, knowing whether the speaker is becoming angry or despondent is useful rational evidence.

Thus, one who has committed to these rules largely gives up the right to complain about emotional provocation, flaming, abuse and other violations of etiquette in the interest of effective debate.

In contrast to radical honesty, Crocker's rules encourage being tactful with anyone who hasn't specifically accepted them. This follows the general principle of being "liberal in what you accept and conservative in what you send".

Blog posts

Related concepts

External links