Difference between revisions of "Hard takeoff"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (External Links)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''hard takeoff''' refers to the creation of an AGI in a matter of minutes, hours or days. This scenario is widely considered much more precarious than a “[[soft takeoff]]”, due to the possibility of an AGI behaving in unexpected ways (ie. Unfriendly AI) with less opportunity to intervene before damage was done. As long as a system had adequate hardware the AGI would also rapidly accelerate into a SAI.
+
A '''hard takeoff''' refers to the creation of an AGI in a matter of minutes, hours or days. This scenario is widely considered much more precarious than a “[[soft takeoff]]”, due to the possibility of an AGI behaving in unexpected ways (ie. [[Unfriendly AI]]) with less opportunity to intervene before damage was done. As long as a system had adequate hardware the AGI would also rapidly accelerate into a SAI.
  
 
The feasibility of “hard takeoff” has been addressed by Hugo de Garis, [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]], [[Ben Goertzel]], [[Nick Bostrom]] and Michael Anissimov. However, there remains debate over whether a “hard takeoff” engineering strategy should be adopted due to the possible risks involved.
 
The feasibility of “hard takeoff” has been addressed by Hugo de Garis, [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]], [[Ben Goertzel]], [[Nick Bostrom]] and Michael Anissimov. However, there remains debate over whether a “hard takeoff” engineering strategy should be adopted due to the possible risks involved.

Revision as of 21:45, 12 June 2012

A hard takeoff refers to the creation of an AGI in a matter of minutes, hours or days. This scenario is widely considered much more precarious than a “soft takeoff”, due to the possibility of an AGI behaving in unexpected ways (ie. Unfriendly AI) with less opportunity to intervene before damage was done. As long as a system had adequate hardware the AGI would also rapidly accelerate into a SAI.

The feasibility of “hard takeoff” has been addressed by Hugo de Garis, Eliezer Yudkowsky, Ben Goertzel, Nick Bostrom and Michael Anissimov. However, there remains debate over whether a “hard takeoff” engineering strategy should be adopted due to the possible risks involved.

Although several science fiction authors have speculated that an AGI “hard takeoff” may happen by accident - for example, “The Internet waking-up” - this opinion is largely dismissed by computer scientist as intelligence is considered to be a hard problem.

Blog Posts

External Links

See Also