Difference between revisions of "Hedon"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(utilons -> utils)
m
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
[[utilitarianism|Utilitarians]] often employ hedons to compare the expected net outcome of pleasure for a given scenario. [[Hedonism]] is an ethical theory that sees the maximization of hedons (and the minimization of dolors) as the most desirable good.
 
[[utilitarianism|Utilitarians]] often employ hedons to compare the expected net outcome of pleasure for a given scenario. [[Hedonism]] is an ethical theory that sees the maximization of hedons (and the minimization of dolors) as the most desirable good.
  
 +
== Blog Posts ==
 +
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/lb/not_for_the_sake_of_happiness_alone/ Not for the Sake of Happiness (Alone)]
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
  

Latest revision as of 07:41, 13 July 2012

The unit philosophers use to quantify pleasure. Hedons are abstract units with no standardized metric: the assignment of hedons to experiences is typically very broad, loose, subjective, and case dependent. Negative hedons can stand for whatever detracts from a pleasurable experience, or for pain -- though sometimes the unit used for pain is the "dolor".

For example, we might say that eating an ice cream cone yields 3 hedons to a normal individual, while solving an intensely difficult logic puzzle yields 15 hedons. The frustration undergone in the course of figuring out the puzzle might be judged as -20 hedons (or 20 dolors), depending on the puzzle's difficulty and the individual's temperament. The specific numbers chosen are generally not too important; the main point is to give a rough sketch of how the enjoyment of one experience relates to others.

Utilitarians often employ hedons to compare the expected net outcome of pleasure for a given scenario. Hedonism is an ethical theory that sees the maximization of hedons (and the minimization of dolors) as the most desirable good.

Blog Posts

See also