Difference between revisions of "Human universal"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (References)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{wikilink|Cultural universal}}
 
''Complex'' adaptations within a sexually reproducing species need all of their parts, or almost all of their parts, to be universal within the gene pool.
 
''Complex'' adaptations within a sexually reproducing species need all of their parts, or almost all of their parts, to be universal within the gene pool.
  
Line 5: Line 6:
 
One bird may have slightly smoother feathers than another, but they will both have wings.  A single mutation can be possessed by some lucky members of a species, and not by others - but single mutations don't correspond to the sort of complex, powerful machinery that underlies the potency of biology. By the time an adaptation gets to be really sophisticated with dozens of genes supporting its highly refined activity, every member of the species has some version of it - barring single mutations that knock out the whole complex.
 
One bird may have slightly smoother feathers than another, but they will both have wings.  A single mutation can be possessed by some lucky members of a species, and not by others - but single mutations don't correspond to the sort of complex, powerful machinery that underlies the potency of biology. By the time an adaptation gets to be really sophisticated with dozens of genes supporting its highly refined activity, every member of the species has some version of it - barring single mutations that knock out the whole complex.
  
Applying this logic to human brains in particular, we arrive at the explanation for what is called ''the psychic unity of mankind''.  (Though Eliezer Yudkowsky has used the phrase "psychological unity of humankind" instead.)  In every known culture, humans seem to experience joy, sadness, fear, disgust, anger, and surprise.  In every known culture, these emotions are indicated by the same facial expressions.  (Citation needed to Paul Ekman.)
+
Applying this logic to human brains in particular, we arrive at the explanation for what is called ''the psychic unity of mankind''.  (Though [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]] has used the phrase "psychological unity of humankind" instead.)  In every known culture, humans seem to experience joy, sadness, fear, disgust, anger, and surprise.  In every known culture, these emotions are indicated by the same facial expressions.  (Citation needed to Paul Ekman.)
  
 
Donald E. Brown has compiled a list of [http://condor.depaul.edu/~mfiddler/hyphen/humunivers.htm over a hundred human universals] - traits found in every culture ever studied, most of them so universal that anthropologists don't even bother to note them explicitly.
 
Donald E. Brown has compiled a list of [http://condor.depaul.edu/~mfiddler/hyphen/humunivers.htm over a hundred human universals] - traits found in every culture ever studied, most of them so universal that anthropologists don't even bother to note them explicitly.
  
==See also==
+
==Blog posts==
 
 
*[[Evolutionary psychology]]
 
*[[Typical mind fallacy]]
 
 
 
==Primary article==
 
  
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/rl/the_psychological_unity_of_humankind/ The Psychological Unity of Humankind] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/rl/the_psychological_unity_of_humankind/ The Psychological Unity of Humankind] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
 +
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/so/humans_in_funny_suits/ Humans in Funny Suits] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
  
 
*[http://condor.depaul.edu/~mfiddler/hyphen/humunivers.htm Human universals] by [[Donald E. Brown]]
 
*[http://condor.depaul.edu/~mfiddler/hyphen/humunivers.htm Human universals] by [[Donald E. Brown]]
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
 +
*[[Evolutionary psychology]]
 +
*[[Typical mind fallacy]]
 +
*[[Anthropomorphism]]
 +
*[[Complexity of value]], [[fake simplicity]]
 +
*[[Alien values]]
 +
*[[Mind design space]], [[paperclip maximizer]]
  
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 +
[[Category:Psychology]]

Latest revision as of 16:33, 13 March 2012

Smallwikipedialogo.png
Wikipedia has an article about

Complex adaptations within a sexually reproducing species need all of their parts, or almost all of their parts, to be universal within the gene pool.

Let's say that you have a complex adaptation with six interdependent parts, and that each of the six genes is independently at ten percent frequency in the population. The chance of assembling a whole working adaptation is literally a million to one; and the average fitness of the genes is tiny, and they will not increase in frequency.

One bird may have slightly smoother feathers than another, but they will both have wings. A single mutation can be possessed by some lucky members of a species, and not by others - but single mutations don't correspond to the sort of complex, powerful machinery that underlies the potency of biology. By the time an adaptation gets to be really sophisticated with dozens of genes supporting its highly refined activity, every member of the species has some version of it - barring single mutations that knock out the whole complex.

Applying this logic to human brains in particular, we arrive at the explanation for what is called the psychic unity of mankind. (Though Eliezer Yudkowsky has used the phrase "psychological unity of humankind" instead.) In every known culture, humans seem to experience joy, sadness, fear, disgust, anger, and surprise. In every known culture, these emotions are indicated by the same facial expressions. (Citation needed to Paul Ekman.)

Donald E. Brown has compiled a list of over a hundred human universals - traits found in every culture ever studied, most of them so universal that anthropologists don't even bother to note them explicitly.

Blog posts

External links

See also