Difference between revisions of "Least convenient possible world"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Least convenient possible world''' is a technique for enforcing intellectual honesty, to be used when arguing against an idea. The essence of the technique is to assume that all the specific details will align with the idea against which you are arguing, i.e. to consider the idea in the context of a least convenient [[possible world]], where every circumstance is colluding against your objections and counterarguments. This approach ensures that your objections are [[epistemic hygiene|strong enough]], running minimal risk of being [[rationalization|rationalizations]] for your [[color politics|position]].
+
'''Least convenient possible world''' (or '''LCPW''') is a technique for enforcing intellectual honesty, to be used when arguing against an idea. The essence of the technique is to assume that all the specific details will align with the idea against which you are arguing, i.e. to consider the idea in the context of a least convenient [[possible world]], where every circumstance is colluding against your objections and counterarguments. This approach ensures that your objections are [[epistemic hygiene|strong enough]], running minimal risk of being [[rationalization|rationalizations]] for your [[color politics|position]].  
  
==Main post==
+
==Blog posts==
  
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/2k/the_least_convenient_possible_world/ The Least Convenient Possible World] by [[Yvain]]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/2k/the_least_convenient_possible_world/ The Least Convenient Possible World] by [[Yvain]]
 +
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/1p1/logical_rudeness/ Logical Rudeness]
 +
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/wj/is_that_your_true_rejection/ Is That Your True Rejection?]
 +
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/85h/better_disagreement/ Better Disagreement] by [[lukeprog]]
 +
 +
==External links==
 +
 +
*[http://www.cato-unbound.org/2011/09/07/eliezer-yudkowsky/is-that-your-true-rejection/ Is That Your True Rejection?] at Cato Unbound, by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 9: Line 16:
 
*[[Rationalization]]
 
*[[Rationalization]]
 
*[[Epistemic hygiene]]
 
*[[Epistemic hygiene]]
 +
*[[Disagreement]]
 
*[[Rationalist taboo]]
 
*[[Rationalist taboo]]
 
*[[Reversal test]]
 
*[[Reversal test]]
 +
*[[How To Actually Change Your Mind]]
  
 
[[Category:Techniques]]
 
[[Category:Techniques]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Jargon]]
 
[[Category:Jargon]]

Latest revision as of 07:51, 15 March 2012

Least convenient possible world (or LCPW) is a technique for enforcing intellectual honesty, to be used when arguing against an idea. The essence of the technique is to assume that all the specific details will align with the idea against which you are arguing, i.e. to consider the idea in the context of a least convenient possible world, where every circumstance is colluding against your objections and counterarguments. This approach ensures that your objections are strong enough, running minimal risk of being rationalizations for your position.

Blog posts

External links

See also