Difference between revisions of "Least convenient possible world"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The "least convenient possible world" is a tool of intellectual honesty, to be used when arguing against an idea.
+
'''Least convenient possible world''' (or '''LCPW''') is a technique for enforcing intellectual honesty, to be used when arguing against an idea. The essence of the technique is to assume that all the specific details will align with the idea against which you are arguing, i.e. to consider the idea in the context of a least convenient [[possible world]], where every circumstance is colluding against your objections and counterarguments. This approach ensures that your objections are [[epistemic hygiene|strong enough]], running minimal risk of being [[rationalization|rationalizations]] for your [[color politics|position]].  
  
==Summary==
+
==Blog posts==
The essence of the principle is to, when disputing a general argument, assume that all specific details will align with the argument, ''i.e.'', the least convenient possible world in which to make your counterargument. If this world is so unlikely as to be all but impossible, accept the validity of the argument and instead dispute its applicability to the real world.
 
  
==Less Wrong Articles==
+
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/2k/the_least_convenient_possible_world/ The Least Convenient Possible World] by [[Yvain]]
[http://lesswrong.com/lw/2k/the_least_convenient_possible_world/ The Least Convenient Possible World], by [[Yvain]]
+
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/1p1/logical_rudeness/ Logical Rudeness]
 +
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/wj/is_that_your_true_rejection/ Is That Your True Rejection?]
 +
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/85h/better_disagreement/ Better Disagreement] by [[lukeprog]]
  
==See Also==
+
==External links==
<!-- For related LWiki articles, formatted as a list -->
 
  
==References==
+
*[http://www.cato-unbound.org/2011/09/07/eliezer-yudkowsky/is-that-your-true-rejection/ Is That Your True Rejection?] at Cato Unbound, by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
<!-- Always keep this header if there is at least one reference
 
    Delete or add sections below as necessary -->
 
  
=====Footnotes=====
+
==See also==
<references/>
 
  
=====Overcoming Bias Articles=====
+
*[[Rationalization]]
<!-- For related Overcoming Bias articles,
+
*[[Epistemic hygiene]]
    formatted as a list with each entry as "/Title/ by /Author/ -->
+
*[[Disagreement]]
 +
*[[Rationalist taboo]]
 +
*[[Reversal test]]
 +
*[[How To Actually Change Your Mind]]
  
=====Less Wrong Articles=====
+
[[Category:Techniques]]
<!-- For related Less Wrong articles,
+
[[Category:Concepts]]
    formatted as a list with each entry as "/Title/ by /Author/ -->
+
[[Category:Jargon]]
 
 
=====Other Resources=====
 
<!-- For all other resources, formatted as a list -->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[[Category:Tools]]
 

Latest revision as of 07:51, 15 March 2012

Least convenient possible world (or LCPW) is a technique for enforcing intellectual honesty, to be used when arguing against an idea. The essence of the technique is to assume that all the specific details will align with the idea against which you are arguing, i.e. to consider the idea in the context of a least convenient possible world, where every circumstance is colluding against your objections and counterarguments. This approach ensures that your objections are strong enough, running minimal risk of being rationalizations for your position.

Blog posts

External links

See also