Difference between revisions of "Map and territory"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (See also)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 +
 +
*[[Map and territory (sequence)]]
 
*[[The map is not the territory]]
 
*[[The map is not the territory]]
 
*[[Epistemic rationality]]
 
*[[Epistemic rationality]]
Line 17: Line 19:
  
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 +
[[Media:Example.ogg]]

Revision as of 09:20, 9 November 2009

Less confusing than saying "belief and reality", "map and territory" reminds us that a map of Texas is not the same thing as Texas itself. Saying "map" also dispenses with possible meanings of "belief" apart from "representations of some part of reality".

Since our predictions don't always come true, we need different words to describe the thingy that generates our predictions and the thingy that generates our experimental results. The first thingy is called "belief", the second thingy "reality".

Primary article

Blog posts

  • Qualitatively Confused by Eliezer Yudkowsky - Using qualitative, binary reasoning may make it easier to confuse belief and reality; if we use probability distributions, the distinction is much clearer.

See also

Media:Example.ogg