Difference between revisions of "Mind-killer"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(added a link to Graham's "What You Can't Say")
(add political disputes as an obvious example)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Mind-killer''' is a name given to topics (such as [[color politics|politics]] or Nazism) that tend to produce extremely [[Bias|biased]] discussions. Introducing these topics into an otherwise [[Epistemic hygiene|healthy]] discussion (for example, to present an analogy) may ruin it, encouraging fallacious modes of thinking.
+
'''Mind-killer''' is a name given to topics (such as [[color politics|politics]] or Nazism) that tend to produce extremely [[Bias|biased]] discussions.
  
One of the causes of mind-killers is social taboo. Negative [[connotation|connotations]] are associated with these topics, thus creating a strong bias supported by [[signaling]] drives that makes non-negative characterization of these topics appear [[absurdity heuristic|absurd]].
+
Politics is one obvious cause of '''mind-killer''' disputes:  Political disputes are not limited to standard disagreements about factual matters, or even to dispute of personality or perspective: they involve matters that people physically fight over in the real world—or at least, matters that are to be enforced by the government's monopoly of violence.  Accordingly, such people may come here to [[Less Wrong]] in order to diligently reduce their casualties and add more recruits to their side. 
 +
 
 +
Another cause of mind-killers is social taboo. Negative [[connotation|connotations]] are associated with these topics, thus creating a strong bias supported by [[signaling]] drives that makes non-negative characterization of these topics appear [[absurdity heuristic|absurd]].
 +
 
 +
It may be particularly important for Less Wrong to encourage a rational perspective with respect to these contentious topics.  Nevertheless, introducing these topics into an otherwise [[Epistemic hygiene|healthy]] discussion (for example, to present an analogy) may ruin it, encouraging fallacious modes of thinking.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 14: Line 18:
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/gw/politics_is_the_mindkiller/ Politics is the Mind-Killer] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/gw/politics_is_the_mindkiller/ Politics is the Mind-Killer] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/ee/the_mindkiller/ The mind-killer] by [[ciphergoth]]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/ee/the_mindkiller/ The mind-killer] by [[ciphergoth]]
 +
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/12w/absolute_denial_for_atheists/ Absolute denial for atheists] by [[taw]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Revision as of 11:10, 19 July 2009

Mind-killer is a name given to topics (such as politics or Nazism) that tend to produce extremely biased discussions.

Politics is one obvious cause of mind-killer disputes: Political disputes are not limited to standard disagreements about factual matters, or even to dispute of personality or perspective: they involve matters that people physically fight over in the real world—or at least, matters that are to be enforced by the government's monopoly of violence. Accordingly, such people may come here to Less Wrong in order to diligently reduce their casualties and add more recruits to their side.

Another cause of mind-killers is social taboo. Negative connotations are associated with these topics, thus creating a strong bias supported by signaling drives that makes non-negative characterization of these topics appear absurd.

It may be particularly important for Less Wrong to encourage a rational perspective with respect to these contentious topics. Nevertheless, introducing these topics into an otherwise healthy discussion (for example, to present an analogy) may ruin it, encouraging fallacious modes of thinking.

See also

Blog posts

External links