Difference between revisions of "Mind-killer"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (See also)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
It may be particularly important for Less Wrong to encourage a rational perspective with respect to these contentious topics.  Nevertheless, introducing these topics into an otherwise [[Epistemic hygiene|healthy]] discussion (for example, to present an analogy) may ruin it, encouraging fallacious modes of thinking.
 
It may be particularly important for Less Wrong to encourage a rational perspective with respect to these contentious topics.  Nevertheless, introducing these topics into an otherwise [[Epistemic hygiene|healthy]] discussion (for example, to present an analogy) may ruin it, encouraging fallacious modes of thinking.
 
==See also==
 
 
*[[Color politics]]
 
*[[Epistemic hygiene]]
 
*[[Affect heuristic]]
 
*[[Dark arts]]
 
*[[Signaling]]
 
*[[Narrative fallacy]]
 
  
 
==Blog posts==
 
==Blog posts==
Line 27: Line 18:
  
 
*[http://paulgraham.com/say.html What You Can't Say] by [[Paul Graham]] - Discusses "moral fashions" and social taboos and how they mind-kill certain topics.
 
*[http://paulgraham.com/say.html What You Can't Say] by [[Paul Graham]] - Discusses "moral fashions" and social taboos and how they mind-kill certain topics.
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
 +
*[[Color politics]]
 +
*[[Epistemic hygiene]]
 +
*[[Affect heuristic]]
 +
*[[Dark arts]]
 +
*[[Signaling]]
 +
*[[Narrative fallacy]]
  
 
[[Category:Jargon]]
 
[[Category:Jargon]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]

Revision as of 05:31, 29 September 2009

Mind-killer is a name given to topics (such as politics or Nazism) that tend to produce extremely biased discussions.

Politics is one obvious cause of mind-killer disputes: Political disputes are not limited to standard disagreements about factual matters, nor to disputes of personality or perspective or even faction: they involve matters that people physically fight over in the real world—or at least, matters that are to be enforced by the government's monopoly of violence. Accordingly, politically-motivated people may come here to Less Wrong in order to diligently reduce their casualties and add more recruits to their side.

Successfully mediating a political dispute is clearly beyond our scope, since real-world virtues are required which go far beyond rationality. Many of these virtues were identified by Bernard Crick in his work In Defense of Politics.

Another cause of mind-killers is social taboo. Negative connotations are associated with some topics, thus creating a strong bias supported by signaling drives that makes non-negative characterization of these topics appear absurd.

It may be particularly important for Less Wrong to encourage a rational perspective with respect to these contentious topics. Nevertheless, introducing these topics into an otherwise healthy discussion (for example, to present an analogy) may ruin it, encouraging fallacious modes of thinking.

Blog posts

External links

See also