Difference between revisions of "Moore's law"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(43 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{wikilink}}
 
{{wikilink}}
'''Moore's Law''' is a term attributed to Intel founder Gordon E. Moore who observed in 1965 that the number of transistors that could be purchased inexpensively and placed on an integrated-circuit doubles every year. He later revised this figure to every 2 years (1975). The doubling period is often mistakenly reported as "18 months" or shorter, this is due to being confused with the overall processing power of computers doubling more quickly because of factors such as increases in clock speed, increases in cache memory or improvements in chip design.
+
'''Moore's law''' is a term attributed to Intel founder Gordon E. Moore who observed in 1965 that the number of transistors that could be purchased inexpensively and placed on an integrated circuit doubles every year. In 1975, he revised his estimate to every two years. It is often discussed as a doubling every 18 months, but that is a separate claim by David House, Intel executive, of overall chip performance. Moore's law been approximately correct for four decades.  
  
Importantly, the ability to increase the number of transistors available is due to reducing transistor size rather than increasing the size of the integrated circuit. As of 2012 the smallest commercial available transistors in a microprocessor are 22 nanometers, their 1965 transistor counter-parts were 100 micrometers (100,000 nanometers). Intel have revealed they expect to release a 5nm in the near future which would continue the projections of Moore's law.
+
Though current CMOS technology is predicted to be nonviable below a certain size, many other technologies offer the potential for far greater miniaturization. This may delay Moore's law temporarily while the new technologies enter full-scale production. An end to Moore's law has often been predicted, but has failed to materialize so far.
  
==Blog Post==
+
Moore's law is often cited as a reason to expect the creation of an [[AGI]] in the future, and is crucial for the possibility of [[whole brain emulation]].
  
*[http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/05/intel-begins-work-on-7nm-5nm-process.html Intel reveal 5nm component chip] Next Big Future
+
==References==
 
+
*[http://download.intel.com/museum/Moores_Law/Articles-Press_Releases/Gordon_Moore_1965_Article.pdf Gordon Moore's orignal 1965 paper] Electronics, Volume 38, Number 8, April 19, 1965
==External Links==
+
*[http://download.intel.com/museum/Moores_Law/Articles-Press_Releases/Gordon_Moore_1975_Speech.pdf Progress in Digital Integrated Circuits] Transcript of 1975 speech by Gordon Moore
 
+
*[http://www.itrs.net/reports.html International Technology Roadmap For Semiconductors]
*[ftp://download.intel.com/museum/Moores_Law/Articles-Press_Releases/Gordon_Moore_1965_Article.pdf Gordon Moore's orignal 1965 paper] Electronics, Volume 38, Number 8, April 19, 1965
+
*[http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2012/05/03/michio_kako_and_a_brief_history_of_warnings_about_the_end_of_moore_s_law_.html A History of the End of Moore's Law] Slate
*[http://download.intel.com/museum/Moores_Law/Articles-Press_Releases/Gordon_Moore_1975_Speech.pdf Progress in Digital Integrated Circuits] Transcript of 1975 speech
 

Latest revision as of 21:20, 22 October 2012

Smallwikipedialogo.png
Wikipedia has an article about

Moore's law is a term attributed to Intel founder Gordon E. Moore who observed in 1965 that the number of transistors that could be purchased inexpensively and placed on an integrated circuit doubles every year. In 1975, he revised his estimate to every two years. It is often discussed as a doubling every 18 months, but that is a separate claim by David House, Intel executive, of overall chip performance. Moore's law been approximately correct for four decades.

Though current CMOS technology is predicted to be nonviable below a certain size, many other technologies offer the potential for far greater miniaturization. This may delay Moore's law temporarily while the new technologies enter full-scale production. An end to Moore's law has often been predicted, but has failed to materialize so far.

Moore's law is often cited as a reason to expect the creation of an AGI in the future, and is crucial for the possibility of whole brain emulation.

References