# Difference between revisions of "Newcomb's problem"

From Lesswrongwiki

(added "see also" section) |
JGWeissman (talk | contribs) |
||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

{{wikilink|Newcomb's paradox}} | {{wikilink|Newcomb's paradox}} | ||

− | In '''Newcomb's problem''', a superintelligence called [[Omega]] shows you two boxes, A and B, and offers you the choice of taking only box A, or both boxes A and B. Omega has put $1,000 in box B. If Omega thinks you will take box A only, he has put $1,000,000 in it. Otherwise he has left it empty. Omega has never been wrong in his predictions about whether someone will take both boxes or not. | + | In '''Newcomb's problem''', a superintelligence called [[Omega]] shows you two boxes, A and B, and offers you the choice of taking only box A, or both boxes A and B. Omega has put $1,000 in box B. If Omega thinks you will take box A only, he has put $1,000,000 in it. Otherwise he has left it empty. Omega has played this game many times, and has never been wrong in his predictions about whether someone will take both boxes or not. |

Terms used in relation to this paradox: | Terms used in relation to this paradox: |

## Revision as of 04:16, 20 September 2009

In **Newcomb's problem**, a superintelligence called Omega shows you two boxes, A and B, and offers you the choice of taking only box A, or both boxes A and B. Omega has put $1,000 in box B. If Omega thinks you will take box A only, he has put $1,000,000 in it. Otherwise he has left it empty. Omega has played this game many times, and has never been wrong in his predictions about whether someone will take both boxes or not.

Terms used in relation to this paradox:

**Omega**, the superintelligence who decides whether to put the million in box A.**one-box**: to take only box A**two-box**: to take both boxes