Difference between revisions of "Policy debates should not appear one-sided"
From Lesswrongwiki
Z. M. Davis (talk | contribs) m (→See also: remove spare bracket) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Almost any course of action invariably has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value, means trading off another. | + | Almost any course of action invariably has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value, means trading off another. To see both faces of the issue, '''policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided'''. |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| − | *[[ | + | |
| − | *[[ | + | *[[Preference]] |
| + | *[[Shut up and multiply]] | ||
| + | *[[Game theory]] | ||
| + | *[[Color politics]] | ||
==Blog posts== | ==Blog posts== | ||
| + | |||
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/gz/policy_debates_should_not_appear_onesided/ Policy Debates Should Not Appear One-sided] | *[http://lesswrong.com/lw/gz/policy_debates_should_not_appear_onesided/ Policy Debates Should Not Appear One-sided] | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
Revision as of 06:11, 11 September 2009
Almost any course of action invariably has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value, means trading off another. To see both faces of the issue, policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided.
