Difference between revisions of "Policy debates should not appear one-sided"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (See also: remove spare bracket)
Line 1: Line 1:
Almost any course of action invariably has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value, means trading off another. As a result, '''policy debates of complex issues should not appear one-sided'''.
+
Almost any course of action invariably has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value, means trading off another. To see both faces of the issue, '''policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided'''.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
*[[Mind-killer]]
+
 
*[[Arguments as soldiers]]
+
*[[Preference]]
 +
*[[Shut up and multiply]]
 +
*[[Game theory]]
 +
*[[Color politics]]
  
 
==Blog posts==
 
==Blog posts==
 +
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/gz/policy_debates_should_not_appear_onesided/ Policy Debates Should Not Appear One-sided]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/gz/policy_debates_should_not_appear_onesided/ Policy Debates Should Not Appear One-sided]
  
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}

Revision as of 06:11, 11 September 2009

Almost any course of action invariably has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value, means trading off another. To see both faces of the issue, policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided.

See also

Blog posts