Difference between revisions of "Policy debates should not appear one-sided"
From Lesswrongwiki
Z. M. Davis (talk | contribs) m (→See also: remove spare bracket) |
PeerInfinity (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Almost any course of action | + | Almost any course of action has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value means trading off another. To show both faces of the issue, '''policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided'''. |
| + | |||
| + | ==Blog posts== | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[http://lesswrong.com/lw/gz/policy_debates_should_not_appear_onesided/ Policy Debates Should Not Appear One-Sided] | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | *[[Preference]] | |
| − | *[ | + | *[[Shut up and multiply]] |
| + | *[[Game theory]] | ||
| + | *[[Color politics]] | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:36, 29 September 2009
Almost any course of action has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value means trading off another. To show both faces of the issue, policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided.
