Difference between revisions of "Policy debates should not appear one-sided"
From Lesswrongwiki
PeerInfinity (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Almost any course of action | + | Almost any course of action has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value means trading off another. To show both faces of the issue, '''policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided'''. |
| + | |||
| + | ==Blog posts== | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[http://lesswrong.com/lw/gz/policy_debates_should_not_appear_onesided/ Policy Debates Should Not Appear One-Sided] | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 11: | ||
*[[Game theory]] | *[[Game theory]] | ||
*[[Color politics]] | *[[Color politics]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:36, 29 September 2009
Almost any course of action has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value means trading off another. To show both faces of the issue, policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided.
