Difference between revisions of "Policy debates should not appear one-sided"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Almost any course of action invariably has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value means trading off another. To show both faces of the issue, '''policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided'''.
+
Almost any course of action has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value means trading off another. To show both faces of the issue, '''policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided'''.
 +
 
 +
==Blog posts==
 +
 
 +
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/gz/policy_debates_should_not_appear_onesided/ Policy Debates Should Not Appear One-Sided]
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 7: Line 11:
 
*[[Game theory]]
 
*[[Game theory]]
 
*[[Color politics]]
 
*[[Color politics]]
 
==Blog posts==
 
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/gz/policy_debates_should_not_appear_onesided/ Policy Debates Should Not Appear One-sided]
 
  
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}

Latest revision as of 04:36, 29 September 2009

Almost any course of action has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value means trading off another. To show both faces of the issue, policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided.

Blog posts

See also