Difference between revisions of "Problem of verifying rationality"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Blog posts: fixed {{lesswrongtag}} usage)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/6d/ask_lw_what_questions_to_test_in_our_rationality/ Ask LW: What questions to test in our rationality questionnaire?] by [[Anna Salamon]] - Requesting suggestions for an actual survey to be run.
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/6d/ask_lw_what_questions_to_test_in_our_rationality/ Ask LW: What questions to test in our rationality questionnaire?] by [[Anna Salamon]] - Requesting suggestions for an actual survey to be run.
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/1kh/the_correct_contrarian_cluster/ The Correct Contrarian Cluster]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/1kh/the_correct_contrarian_cluster/ The Correct Contrarian Cluster]
{{lesswrongtag|verification}}
+
*{{lesswrongtag|verification}}
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Revision as of 02:22, 31 October 2010

The single largest problem for those desiring to create methods of systematically training for increased epistemic and instrumental rationality - how to verify that the training actually worked. Very Awful Things happen to people who set out to build training methods and schools without strong means of verification - two hideous historical examples being modern-day practice of martial arts (once the teachers are no longer fighting duels to the death) and the proliferating "schools" of psychotherapy (in the entire absence of any experimental evidence that one school worked better than another, and indeed, in the presence of experimental evidence that the schools did not have any discernible difference in effectiveness).

Primary article

  • 3 Levels of Rationality Verification - Reputational, experimental, and organizational: the different strengths of evidence needed to (a) prevent a school from degenerating, (b) systematically test particular techniques, or (c) credential individuals.

Blog posts

See also