Difference between revisions of "Simulation Argument"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{wikilink}}
 
{{wikilink}}
The '''Simulation Argument''' is an argument for the [[Simulation Hypothesis]], first proposed in 2003 by Nick Bostrom.  The important distinction between this and earlier simulation models has been the addition of a proposed method of  engineering Simulated Reality through the use of computers and the assumption that the conscious beings themselves are simulated, rather than merely "brains in a vat". The argument also suggests that it is far more likely that we are living in a Simulation than we are not.
+
The '''Simulation Argument''' is an argument for the [[Simulation Hypothesis]], first proposed in 2003 by Nick Bostrom's paper "Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?" where he argues that one of following propositions is true: "(1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation."
 
 
The concept was popularized by Nick Bostrom's paper "Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?" where he argues that one of following propositions is true: "(1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation."
 
  
  

Revision as of 05:57, 4 June 2012

Smallwikipedialogo.png
Wikipedia has an article about

The Simulation Argument is an argument for the Simulation Hypothesis, first proposed in 2003 by Nick Bostrom's paper "Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?" where he argues that one of following propositions is true: "(1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation."


References

External links

See also