|
|
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | {{wikilink}}
| + | #REDIRECT [[Simulation argument]] |
− | The '''Simulation Argument''' is an argument for the [[Simulation Hypothesis]], although first proposed by Hans Moravec the concept was popularized in 2003 by Nick Bostrom's paper "Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?" where he argues that one of following propositions is true: "(1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation."
| |
− | | |
− | ==References==
| |
− | | |
− | * Morvec, Hans (1998) [http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/~hpm/project.archive/general.articles/1998/SimConEx.98.html Simulation, Consciousness, Existence]
| |
− | | |
− | * Bostrom, Nick (2001,2003) [http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.pdf Are You Living in a Computer Simulation] Philosophical Quarterly (2003) Vol. 53, No. 211, pp. 243‐255.
| |
− | | |
− | * Bostrom, Nick (2011) [http://www.simulation-argument.com/patch.pdf A Patch for the Simulation Argument] Analysis, Vol. 71, No. 1 (2011): 54-61
| |
− | | |
− | ==External links==
| |
− | | |
− | *[http://www.simulation-argument.com/ Nick Bostrom's Simulation Argument Resource page]
| |
− | | |
− | ==See also==
| |
− | | |
− | *[[Simulation Hypothesis]]
| |