Difference between revisions of "Simulation Argument"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(External links)
Line 14: Line 14:
*[http://www.simulation-argument.com/ Nick Bostrom's Simulation Argument Resource page]
*[http://www.simulation-argument.com/ Nick Bostrom's Simulation Argument Resource page]
*[http://hplusmagazine.com/2011/01/18/is-god-an-alien-mathematician/ Is God an Alien Mathematician?] — A discussion between Ben Goertzel and Hugo de Garis on Simulated Universes and their Creators
*[http://www.kurzweilai.net/from-cosmism-to-deism From cosmism to deism] — Hugo de Garis's essay on Simulated Universes
==See also==
==See also==
*[[Simulation Hypothesis]]
*[[Simulation Hypothesis]]

Revision as of 05:48, 4 June 2012

Wikipedia has an article about

The Simulation Argument is one of a number of ideas related to the Simulation Hypothesis. The important distinction between this argument and earlier simulation models has been the addition of a proposed method of engineering Simulated Reality through the use of computers and the assumption that the conscious beings themselves are simulated, rather than merely "brains in a vat". The argument also suggests that it is far more likely that we are living in a Simulation than we are not.

The concept was popularized by Nick Bostrom's paper "Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?" where he argues that one of following propositions is true: "(1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation."


External links

See also