Simulation Argument

From Lesswrongwiki
Revision as of 01:45, 17 June 2012 by Daniel Trenor (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search
Smallwikipedialogo.png
Wikipedia has an article about

The Simulation Argument is an argument for the Simulation Hypothesis, the concept was popularized in 2003 by Nick Bostrom's paper "Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?" where he argues that one of following propositions is true: "(1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation."

Importantly his argument differs from others related to the Simulation Hypothesis in two important respects. Firstly, Bostrom argues that it is far more likely that we are living in a simulation than we are not. And secondly, unlike the scenario depicted in the movie "The Matrix", human beings themselves are simulated, rather than "real" creatures merely "plugged" into a simulation.

References

External links

See also