Difference between revisions of "Suffering risk"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(See also)
(+)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Suffering risks''' (also known as '''s-risks''') are risks of the creation of suffering in the far future on an astronomical scale. In this sense they can be considered a form of [[existential risk]] according to Bostrom's original definition, but it may be useful to distinguish between risks that threaten to prevent future populations from coming into existence (standard x-risks) and those which would instantiate a large amount of suffering (s-risks).
+
'''Suffering risks''' (also known as '''s-risks''') are risks of the creation of suffering in the far future on an astronomical scale, vastly exceeding all suffering that has existed on Earth so far. In this sense, many s-risks can be considered a form of [[existential risk]] according to Bostrom's original definition, as they threaten to "curtail [humanity's] potential". However, it is often useful to distinguish between risks that threaten to prevent future populations from coming into existence (standard x-risks) and those which would create a large amount of suffering (s-risks).
 
 
Although the [[Machine Intelligence Research Institute]] and [[Future of Humanity Institute]] have investigated strategies to prevent s-risks, the only [[EA]] organization with s-risk prevention as its primary focus is the [[Foundational Research Institute]].
 
  
 +
Although the [[Machine Intelligence Research Institute]] and [[Future of Humanity Institute]] have investigated strategies to prevent s-risks, the only [[EA]] organization with s-risk prevention research as its primary focus is the [[Foundational Research Institute]]. Another approach to reducing s-risk is to "expand the moral circle", so that future (post)human civilizations and AI are less likely to [[instrumental value|instrumentally]] cause suffering to non-human minds such as animals or digital sentience. [Sentience Institute](http://www.sentienceinstitute.org/) works on this value-spreading problem.
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Line 13: Line 12:
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
 
* [https://foundational-research.org/reducing-risks-of-astronomical-suffering-a-neglected-global-priority/ Reducing Risks of Astronomical Suffering: A Neglected Global Priority]
 
* [https://foundational-research.org/reducing-risks-of-astronomical-suffering-a-neglected-global-priority/ Reducing Risks of Astronomical Suffering: A Neglected Global Priority]
 +
* [https://foundational-research.org/s-risks-talk-eag-boston-2017/

Revision as of 00:09, 21 June 2017

Suffering risks (also known as s-risks) are risks of the creation of suffering in the far future on an astronomical scale, vastly exceeding all suffering that has existed on Earth so far. In this sense, many s-risks can be considered a form of existential risk according to Bostrom's original definition, as they threaten to "curtail [humanity's] potential". However, it is often useful to distinguish between risks that threaten to prevent future populations from coming into existence (standard x-risks) and those which would create a large amount of suffering (s-risks).

Although the Machine Intelligence Research Institute and Future of Humanity Institute have investigated strategies to prevent s-risks, the only EA organization with s-risk prevention research as its primary focus is the Foundational Research Institute. Another approach to reducing s-risk is to "expand the moral circle", so that future (post)human civilizations and AI are less likely to instrumentally cause suffering to non-human minds such as animals or digital sentience. [Sentience Institute](http://www.sentienceinstitute.org/) works on this value-spreading problem.

See also

External links