Difference between revisions of "Talk:Debate tools"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Suggestions for improvement: "pros/cons/first mentioned" format is artificial, and notes there are of little use (either remove them all, or integrate in the summary, except for ...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Suggestions for improvement: "pros/cons/first mentioned" format is artificial, and notes there are of little use (either remove them all, or integrate in the summary, except for "first mentioned"). The word "Summary" doesn't need to be used. --[[User:Vladimir Nesov|Vladimir Nesov]] 07:57, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 
Suggestions for improvement: "pros/cons/first mentioned" format is artificial, and notes there are of little use (either remove them all, or integrate in the summary, except for "first mentioned"). The word "Summary" doesn't need to be used. --[[User:Vladimir Nesov|Vladimir Nesov]] 07:57, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
Suggestion: Would pol.is count as a debate tool? It's more like a consultation / consensus-building tool... https://blog.pol.is/pol-is-in-taiwan-da7570d372b5?gi=d4362adab60d

Latest revision as of 06:16, 9 September 2016

Suggestions for improvement: "pros/cons/first mentioned" format is artificial, and notes there are of little use (either remove them all, or integrate in the summary, except for "first mentioned"). The word "Summary" doesn't need to be used. --Vladimir Nesov 07:57, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Suggestion: Would pol.is count as a debate tool? It's more like a consultation / consensus-building tool... https://blog.pol.is/pol-is-in-taiwan-da7570d372b5?gi=d4362adab60d