Difference between revisions of "Talk:Etiquette"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I don't know if "Etiquette" is the proper title for this page.  Thoughts? [[User:MrHen|MrHen]] 20:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 
I don't know if "Etiquette" is the proper title for this page.  Thoughts? [[User:MrHen|MrHen]] 20:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 
:Please start pages already with at least proper stubs, so that the intent is clear and there is some value and quality in the page as it is. It's very important not to allow bit rot in. For now, there are pages [[FAQ]] and [[Less Wrong]], which are more about the blog than the wiki, as possible places to start or interlink. --[[User:Vladimir Nesov|Vladimir Nesov]] 21:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 
:Please start pages already with at least proper stubs, so that the intent is clear and there is some value and quality in the page as it is. It's very important not to allow bit rot in. For now, there are pages [[FAQ]] and [[Less Wrong]], which are more about the blog than the wiki, as possible places to start or interlink. --[[User:Vladimir Nesov|Vladimir Nesov]] 21:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 +
:: I couldn't find a template for Stubs.  What are you talking about? [[User:MrHen|MrHen]] 22:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:22, 9 January 2010

I don't know if "Etiquette" is the proper title for this page. Thoughts? MrHen 20:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Please start pages already with at least proper stubs, so that the intent is clear and there is some value and quality in the page as it is. It's very important not to allow bit rot in. For now, there are pages FAQ and Less Wrong, which are more about the blog than the wiki, as possible places to start or interlink. --Vladimir Nesov 21:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
I couldn't find a template for Stubs. What are you talking about? MrHen 22:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)