# Difference between revisions of "Talk:Expected value"

From Lesswrongwiki

(Created page with 'Anyone objects to deleting this page? There seems to be no significance to it, it's even not linked from anywhere. --~~~~') |
Adamzerner (talk | contribs) (→Perhaps the example should include probabilities: new section) |
||

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

Anyone objects to deleting this page? There seems to be no significance to it, it's even not linked from anywhere. --[[User:Vladimir Nesov|Vladimir Nesov]] 23:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC) | Anyone objects to deleting this page? There seems to be no significance to it, it's even not linked from anywhere. --[[User:Vladimir Nesov|Vladimir Nesov]] 23:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC) | ||

+ | |||

+ | == Video to demonstrate how to NOT think about expected value == | ||

+ | |||

+ | http://youtu.be/kuXIpxoMYtc?t=20s | ||

+ | |||

+ | George Gervin (NBA Legend) says that the 3-point shot is the worst shot in basketball. His argument is basically that 3-point percentages are almost always lower than 2-point percentages. He seems to not give any weight to the fact that 3-point shots provide you with one extra point... | ||

+ | |||

+ | == Perhaps the example should include probabilities == | ||

+ | |||

+ | The example with the 6-sided die doesn't explicitly show how probabilities are part of the calculation. Perhaps the example should do this. |

## Latest revision as of 17:18, 14 February 2015

Anyone objects to deleting this page? There seems to be no significance to it, it's even not linked from anywhere. --Vladimir Nesov 23:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

## Video to demonstrate how to NOT think about expected value

http://youtu.be/kuXIpxoMYtc?t=20s

George Gervin (NBA Legend) says that the 3-point shot is the worst shot in basketball. His argument is basically that 3-point percentages are almost always lower than 2-point percentages. He seems to not give any weight to the fact that 3-point shots provide you with one extra point...

## Perhaps the example should include probabilities

The example with the 6-sided die doesn't explicitly show how probabilities are part of the calculation. Perhaps the example should do this.