Difference between revisions of "Traditional rationality"
From Lesswrongwiki
m (4 revisions: migrate_wiki.py script) |
PeerInfinity (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<!-- For related Overcoming Bias articles, | <!-- For related Overcoming Bias articles, | ||
formatted as a list with each entry as "/Title/ by /Author/ --> | formatted as a list with each entry as "/Title/ by /Author/ --> | ||
− | * [http:// | + | *[http://lesswrong.com/lw/k1/no_one_can_exempt_you_from_rationalitys_laws/ No One Can Exempt You From Rationality's Laws] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]] |
− | * [http:// | + | *[http://lesswrong.com/lw/iy/my_wild_and_reckless_youth/ My Wild and Reckless Youth] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]] |
− | * [http:// | + | *[http://lesswrong.com/lw/q9/the_failures_of_eld_science/ The Failures of Eld Science] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]] |
[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:Concepts]] |
Revision as of 01:12, 7 August 2009
- "Traditional Rationality is phrased in terms of social rules, with violations interpretable as cheating - as defections from cooperative norms. If you want me to accept a belief from you, you are obligated to provide me with a certain amount of evidence. If you try to get out of it, we all know you're cheating on your obligation. A theory is obligated to make bold predictions for itself, not just steal predictions that other theories have labored to make. A theory is obligated to expose itself to falsification - if it tries to duck out, that's like trying to duck out of a fearsome initiation ritual; you must pay your dues."[1]