Difference between revisions of "Traditional rationality"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(See also)
m (Blog posts: These posts are already in Science, and are more relevant there.)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/iy/my_wild_and_reckless_youth/ My Wild and Reckless Youth]  by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/iy/my_wild_and_reckless_youth/ My Wild and Reckless Youth]  by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/q9/the_failures_of_eld_science/ The Failures of Eld Science] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/q9/the_failures_of_eld_science/ The Failures of Eld Science] by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]]
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/qa/the_dilemma_science_or_bayes/ The Dilemma: Science or Bayes?] by [http://lesswrong.com/user/Eliezer_Yudkowsky Eliezer_Yudkowsky]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/qb/science_doesnt_trust_your_rationality/ Science Doesn't Trust Your Rationality] by [http://lesswrong.com/user/Eliezer_Yudkowsky Eliezer_Yudkowsky]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/qc/when_science_cant_help/ When Science Can't Help] by [http://lesswrong.com/user/Eliezer_Yudkowsky Eliezer_Yudkowsky]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/qd/science_isnt_strict_enough/ Science Isn't Strict Enough] by [http://lesswrong.com/user/Eliezer_Yudkowsky Eliezer_Yudkowsky]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/qe/do_scientists_already_know_this_stuff/ Do Scientists Already Know This Stuff?] by [http://lesswrong.com/user/Eliezer_Yudkowsky Eliezer_Yudkowsky]
 
*[http://lesswrong.com/lw/qf/no_safe_defense_not_even_science/ No Safe Defense, Not Even Science] by [http://lesswrong.com/user/Eliezer_Yudkowsky Eliezer_Yudkowsky]
 
  
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]

Revision as of 03:35, 25 September 2009

Traditional Rationality is phrased in terms of social rules, with violations interpretable as cheating - as defections from cooperative norms. If you want me to accept a belief from you, you are obligated to provide me with a certain amount of evidence. If you try to get out of it, we all know you're cheating on your obligation. A theory is obligated to make bold predictions for itself, not just steal predictions that other theories have labored to make. A theory is obligated to expose itself to falsification - if it tries to duck out, that's like trying to duck out of a fearsome initiation ritual; you must pay your dues.

See also

Blog posts