Difference between revisions of "User talk:John Maxwell IV"

From Lesswrongwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Homepage)
(The Hanson-Yudkowsky AI-Foom Debate: new section)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
It seems a bit suspicious that [[User:BabySloth]] created an account specifically to edit the thing you and [[User:Grognor|Groggy]] have been revert warring over. Stranger coincidences have happened before... but rarely. [[User:Paper-machine|Paper-machine]] 22:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
+
== The Hanson-Yudkowsky AI-Foom Debate ==
:It's true, I created a new account because I could tell Grognor was upset with me and I didn't think he would take any changes I propose from this account seriously. I was saddened and shocked to see that he reverted the edits I made with a different account without justifying the reversion, even though my edits resolved his previous complaints. I am really sorry that this is going on and I don't see a good way to move forward on this issue.--[[User:John Maxwell IV|John Maxwell IV]] 23:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 
  
== Homepage ==
+
Totally agreed that that sentence was false and obnoxious - should have removed it myself! Thanks for being bold! [[User:Ciphergoth|Ciphergoth]] ([[User talk:Ciphergoth|talk]]) 02:54, 3 February 2013 (EST)
 
 
What did you see on the homepage? I've guesses that all was good, other than that you were seeing an old brain image - I've tried to bust the cached brain image. If this does happen again, can you go into more detail in your wiki edit? --[[User:Matt|Matt]] 08:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 
 
 
: What I'm seeing: http://imgur.com/bn0RE. Thanks for hosting Less Wrong by the way! I feel reluctant to report this stuff, hopefully you guys find it helpful. --[[User:John Maxwell IV|John Maxwell IV]] 23:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 
 
 
:: That's an old version of the brain. Refreshing the page should clear it… but your cache should have cleared it anyway (it's serving as "http://wiki.lesswrong.com/mediawiki/images/f/f5/LW-brain.png?5423" where the "?5423" should invalidate your previous cache. --[[User:Matt|Matt]] 07:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 01:54, 3 February 2013

The Hanson-Yudkowsky AI-Foom Debate

Totally agreed that that sentence was false and obnoxious - should have removed it myself! Thanks for being bold! Ciphergoth (talk) 02:54, 3 February 2013 (EST)